![gay twitter backgrounds gay twitter backgrounds](https://p7.hiclipart.com/preview/154/510/533/lgbt-homosexuality-gay-computer-icons-clip-art-gay-twitter-icon.jpg)
Musk may have invited an inconvenient amount of political scrutiny for a guy who has worked, and continues to work, with the federal government … To run a social-media company in 2022 is to invite metric tons of scorn to be heaped upon you every minute of your waking life. Why would anyone do this to themselves? Wait, no, maybe he’s actually got this? Or maybe the shark eats him immediately? Everything is in play here.
Gay twitter backgrounds install#
I’ll publish a selection of correspondence in Friday’s newsletter.ĭerek Thompson observes that Elon Musk is “a brilliant executive,” noting that “one of his companies technologically outpaced NASA at the same time that his other project became the most valuable car company in the world.” Still, he argues, no one knows how Musk will fare at Twitter, “unlocking the value of its content, opening the free-speech spigot, clamping down on abuse, all while making heavy users on both the far left and the far right simultaneously happy.”Ī hard-tech CEO choosing to install himself as head of a chaotic social-media scrum is like the world’s most talented lion tamer paying to lock himself inside a shark tank with a great white. And thank you in advance for all of the hard work––after all, content moderation is hard.Įmail your thoughts to. Or if you know what you want to ban but can’t seem to write a viable rule to ban it, explain your difficulty. Want a rule against misinformation or disinformation? Write it and explain exactly how judgment calls will be made on an ongoing basis. Want the First Amendment standard? Bite the bullet, acknowledge the harrowing stuff you’ll therefore allow, and defend that as the least-bad option. Of course, you can’t tackle everything in your answer––but while focusing on what matters to you, I urge you to give specifics! For example, if you want a rule against hate speech, define “hate speech,” write the rule, and give examples of edge cases that do and don’t qualify.
![gay twitter backgrounds gay twitter backgrounds](https://i.pinimg.com/originals/a2/50/a5/a250a5efe78e340305e240c6ec74fad7.jpg)
That brings us to this week’s question: What should the content-moderation rules at Twitter be? Musk: lives are at risk, and so is American democracy. Protecting our democracy is of utmost importance, especially as the midterm elections approach. Do not allow Twitter to become a petri dish for hate speech, or falsehoods that subvert our democracy. Do not allow 45 to return to the platform. Disinformation, misinformation and hate speech have NO PLACE on Twitter.
![gay twitter backgrounds gay twitter backgrounds](https://i.pinimg.com/736x/f1/05/76/f1057683070c23f1a752a3d7e1c8b767.jpg)
Gay twitter backgrounds free#
Musk: free speech is wonderful, hate speech is unacceptable. Here’s Marc Andreessen articulating a case for that approach: Of course, Twitter is not bound by the First Amendment, but it could voluntarily adopt First Amendment standards, declaring that if the government would be legally unable to censor a given tweet, then Twitter will treat that tweet as safe from its corporate censors as a matter of policy. Therefore, going beyond the law is contrary to the will of the people.” If people want less free speech, they will ask government to pass laws to that effect. I am against censorship that goes far beyond the law. Musk called free speech “the bedrock of a functioning democracy” and signaled his intention to make Twitter a platform that constrains it less often than it does now, later clarifying that “by ‘free speech,’ I simply mean that which matches the law.
Gay twitter backgrounds how to#
Anticipating that the deal will go through, many are advising him on how to improve the platform, with a focus on the tension between free speech and content moderation. Sign up for the newsletter here.Įlon Musk bought Twitter. Every Friday, he publishes some thoughtful replies. On Wednesdays, he rounds up timely conversations and solicits reader responses to one thought-provoking question. This is an edition of Up for Debate, a newsletter by Conor Friedersdorf.